Thursday, 11 September 2008

Leafleting Petitioning

In North London we are being 'consulted' on the North London Waste Plan. There has been one workshop in Waltham Forest attended by about 20 local people. The vast majority of residents know nothing about the plans. The consultation methods so far have been insufficient and very low key.

If you are interested in participating in the campaign, spreading the word by distributing meeting flyers and/or petitioning your street, workplace, sport or social club please send us an Email to residentsagainstpollution@googlemail.com with the subject "Leafleting/petitioning". After checking the table below, to see which areas have already been covered, please let us know which new areas you can cover and whether you are interested in leafleting or petitioning or both.

If your street has already been covered and you do not wish to leaflet / petition in unfamiliar streets, do still contact us as we may be able to partner you up with the other person distributing in your street - many hands make light work.

STREET
 
Blackhorse Lane
Bemsted Rd
Blenheim Rd
Bramley Close
Bunyan Rd
Buxton Rd
Carisbrooke Rd
Carr Rd
Century Rd
Chatam Rd
Chewton Rd
Church Rd
Claremont Rd
Clarence Rd
Clifton Ave
Colville Rd
Cumberland Rd
Elmsdale Rd
Elphinstone Rd
Fairfield Rd
Farnborough Ave
Fleeming Rd
Goldsmith Rd
Gloucester Rd
Hamilton Rd
Hartington Rd
Higham Hill Rd
Higham Place
Higham St
Hillyfield
Holms Ave
King Edward Rd
Lancaster Rd
Lee Close
Longfield Ave
Lowther Rd
Mayfield Rd
Mersey Rd
Monks Close
Mount Pleasant Rd
Norfolk Rd
Northcote Rd
Oakfield Rd
Oatland Rise (including the St. Andrew's Ct block of flats)
Pasquier Rd
Pembar Ave
Pennant Terrace
Pretoria Ave
Priors Croft
Queen Elizabeth Rd
Renness Rd
Roma Rd
Shakespeare Rd
Stirling Rd
Sutherland Rd
Tavistock Ave
William Morris Close
Winns Ave
Winns Terrace
Worcester Rd

Tuesday, 2 September 2008

Our Health At Risk

Seven North London boroughs are making new plans for waste disposal. They are looking at possible new sites for dealing with all waste in North London - household, business, and toxic waste. Of 6 proposed new sites, 4 are along the Lea Valley and two are in Waltham Forest. The Blackhorse Lane industrial estate is one of these proposed new sites. Though they are not yet definite, it is very likely the plans will include a new incinerator at one of the sites, and/or expansion of the Edmonton incinerator.

Residents Against Pollution is a campaign by local residents in the Blackhorse Lane area and others across Waltham Forest. We set up our campaign after we found out about the public consultation on the North London Waste Plan. We say:

HANDS OFF BLACKHORSE LANE!
Blackhorse Lane is currently designated an industrial area for planning purposes, which is one of the reasons why it is being considered as a waste site. It is, however, also a residential area, with a higher than average proportion of children and people with limiting long-term illness. Not only that, several new, large scale, high density housing projects are under development in the near vicinity, which will make the area considerably more densly populated. Instead of improving amenities to cater for the increased population (e.g. additional parks, libraries or leisure facilities) which would help to improve the health of residents, proposals are to site a waste facility, possibly an incinerator there. Is this not at odds with the regeneration plans which were so well publicised by the council, but which now seem to have gone quiet, and which made no mention of a waste disposal site? Certainly it is difficult to see how a waste site serving all of North London fits in with the council’s plans, as described by Cllr Loakes, to make Blackhorse Lane a "thriving, more attractive part of the borough".

DON'T DUMP ON WALTHAM FOREST!
The planners are looking at different sites across North London, a disproportionate number of them are in Waltham Forest. Most incinerators in the country are in poor, working class areas. Why should a densely populated area such as Waltham Forest have to deal with a huge percentage of the waste generated by seven boroughs? Why are there not proposed sites in the less densely populated, wealthier areas?

WE DON'T WANT INCINERATORS!
Government policy is to encourage new incinerators to be built, they call it 'energy from waste' to sound environmentally friendly, but actually incineration is an unsafe method. It is true that there does need to be alternatives to landfill. But NOT at the expense of our health!

High infant mortality rates and respiratory problems are linked to pollution emitted by incinerators. Studies have shown higher rates of adult and childhood cancer and birth defects. Incinerators do not solve the problem of landfill because the ash produced is 30 to 50% of the original waste volume and is buried in landfill sites. They release carbon dioxide that contributes to global warming.There are safe alternatives: various forms of composting, anaerobic digestion or gasification. 94% of public waste can be dealt with by methods other than incineration, and the remaining 6% is safer sent to controlled landfill rather than burning it. We think the profit motive should be taken out of waste disposal and investment put into re-use, recycling, waste reduction, and safe alternatives to incineration.

GIVE US A REAL SAY!
In North London we are being 'consulted' on the North London Waste Plan. There has been one workshop in Waltham Forest attended by about 20 local people. The vast majority of residents know nothing about the plans. The consultation methods so far have been insufficient and very low key. The link between obtaining 'energy from waste'and the building of new incinerators has not been made clear. In the Blackhorse Lane area we set up a Residents Against Pollution campaign and 40 local people came to a meeting to object to the plans. That meeting was clear: don't dump on working class areas, no to incinerators, and we want a real say!

But since then Waltham Forest council has made decisions about how to deal with household waste. It looks like the strategy could include expanding the Edmonton incinerator. Why were we not consulted about this? How can we trust that our concerns are being taken into account about the Waste Plan, when a decision is made about strategy for household waste and we don't know about it?

Here is the full Residents Against Pollution Statement that we have presented to councillors on your behalf.

HOME

Have Your Say

Things you can do to have your say:
1. Write emails voicing your concerns and questions about the North London Waste Strategy Plan.
Your councillors are duty bound to respond to you so chase them up if you do not get a reply.

2. Use the internet Write to the Mayor of London - There is an easy-to-use online contact form for you to contact Boris Johnson here: http://www.boris-johnson.com/contact/

3. Spread the word! You are welcome to use the Residents Against Pollution campaign materials to spread the word.

4. Subscribe to the Residents Against Pollution blog.

HOME

Campaign Materials

These A4 posters can be printed off and posted in your front room window, the passenger window of your car, pinned on club and community notice boards, pasted on the back of a breakfast cereal box or any other recycled cardboard and used as a placard, they can be folded into paper aeroplanes or used to wrap packed lunches - any imaginative means you can think of to spread the word.


RAP poster: I </3 The North London Waste Plan
Click on the image to download an A4 PDF for printing.
Click here for a black and white version of this poster.


RAP poster: LBWF Did Not Consult Me!
Click on the image to download an A4 PDF for printing.
Click here for a black and white version of this poster.


RAP poster: Neigh to incinerators! Not on your nelly!
Click on the image to download an A4 PDF for printing.


RAP poster: Walthamstow 2012
Click on the image to download an A4 PDF for printing.

HOME

Monday, 1 September 2008

Have Your Say: Participate In The RAP September 30th Action At The Town Hall

RAPaction_Sep30th

Have your say. Bring your concerns about the decisions councillors are making now on The North London Waste Strategy, and their future implications in The North London Waste Plan, to the attention of the LBWF Council.

Join local residents in front of the Town Hall steps at 6pm, on Tuesday, September the 30th. Bring your neighbours, family and friends. Make your own banners and placards, or print our campaign posters and bring them. Make up chants, and anyone will be welcome to say what they think on the megaphone. Let’s make it clear to Waltham Forest councillors that we will not let them put our health at risk!

If you'd like to support the campaign by distributing leaflets informing people of the Residents Against Pollution campaign and the action at the Town Hall on September the 30th please go to the 'Leafleting Petitioning' page for details.

FAQs

Should you have any questions about the North London Waste Plan or the North London Joint Waste Strategy that are not answered below please send us an Email to residentsagainstpollution@googlemail.com with the subject "FAQ" and we’ll do our best to answer them for you.

What is the North London Waste Plan?
Seven London boroughs are co-operating to look at potential new sites for dealing with all waste – household, commercial, toxic waste – from North London. Part of the plan is to decide how much of North London’s waste should be dealt with in North London. The plan has no concrete proposals at the moment for what kind of facility would be on each site. There is no definite plan at the moment to increase incineration, but it is government policy to do so. There are currently 68 waste sites in North London. The Lea Valley already bears the brunt of these sites.

Which new sites are proposed?
Six new ‘industrial’ sites are proposed, which are earmarked as ‘strategic employment areas’. Four are in the Lea Valley. The planners are keen to point out that these are not definite and that other sites could be possible, but have not yet named them.

Barnet Northern Telecom Industrial Business Park
Enfield Great Cambridge Road Industrial Business Park

The four “Preferred Industrial Locations” in the Lea Valley:
Brimsdown - Enfield
Central Leaside Business Area – Enfield, but on the border with Waltham Forest
Blackhorse Lane – Waltham Forest
Lea Bridge Gateway – Waltham Forest

Which boroughs are involved?
Waltham Forest, Hackney, Islington, Camden, Barnet, Enfield, Haringey. Two councillors from each borough take part in formulating the North London Waste Plan – we have been told that Waltham Forest is represented by Councillors Terry Wheeler Clyde Loakes (who has been appointed chair of the NLWA) and Bob Belam.

What is the consultation process?
A two-year consultation started at the beginning of 2008 and is due to reach a conclusion and start work in 2010. The first phase of the consultation was a workshop in each borough in January/February this year. There was no serious attempt to get people to these workshops – no leaflets through doors, for example. They were advertised in the local papers and only about 20 people came to each one. There have also been stalls in shopping centres, but again not advertised.
The next phase won’t be till the start of 2009, which will be the ‘preferred options’ stage. At this stage it is said nothing is ruled in or ruled out but by sometime in 2009 there will be definite proposals.

What is the North London Joint Waste Strategy?
There is a separate strategy which was started in 2004 and was ‘updated’ in July 2008. It deals with household & business waste only, but involves the same seven boroughs. The councils in each borough discussed options which seem to include an expansion of the Edmonton incinerator, although it is proving difficult to find out exactly what has been agreed. We are concerned that we have been involved in the consultation on the Plan but not the Strategy, when clearly the two overlap.

Isn’t too early to campaign now, when there’s nothing definite to protest about?

While there are no definite plans we need to be clear – not Blackhorse Lane, stop dumping on the Lea Valley area, and we don’t want more incineration. If we wait till there are definite proposals, it will be harder to shift them.

Contact Residents Against Pollution

Residents Against Pollution is a campaign of local residents in the Blackhorse Lane area and others across Waltham Forest. We set up our campaign after we found out about the public consultation on the North London Waste Plan.

If you have any queries or suggestions or if you can help with printing or leafleting, if you have time or skills you can offer to further the campaign please send us an email: residentsagainstpollution@googlemail.com

HOME

Read It For Yourself First Hand

The North London Waste Plan (NLWP) This is the official site published by the North London Waste Authority (NLWA). They have laid out their timetable for the plan and also set out "the scope for public involvement in different stages" in the site's 'Have Your Say' section.

Draft of The North London Waste plan: the Preferred Options ReportFollowing last year’s consultation on the issues and options for the Plan, the seven North London boroughs, Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Hackney, Haringey, Islington, Waltham Forest, have now put together a draft plan.

The North London Waste Plan: Issues and Options Report. This report was produced after the findings of the first stage consultation. Of particular concern is that it lists four “Preferred Industrial Locations” in the Lea Valley:
  • Brimsdown - Enfield
  • Central Leaside Business Area – Enfield, but on the border with Waltham Forest
  • Blackhorse Lane – Waltham Forest
  • Lea Bridge Gateway – Waltham Forest
as a proposed sites for Waste processing; see pg36 ‘Map 2 Strategic Employment Locations in North London Suitable for Recycling and WasteTreatment as Identified in the Early Alterations to the London Plan [Table 4A.7]’ ).

Strategic Environmental Assessment and Adoption of The North London Joint Waste Strategy A report tabled at the LBWF Cabinet meeting Tuesday, 22nd July, 2008 7.30 p.m, wherein Table 1: Features of the Five Scenarios Assessed by the SEA (the Strategic Environmental Assessment of the North London Joint Waste Strategy (NLJWS) process), pg 16 of the pdf, pg 169 of the document, it is evident that four of the five scenarios propose the building of a new Energy from Waste (EfW) plant (in lay terms, an incinerator).

Here is the full Residents Against Pollution Statement that we have presented to councillors on your behalf.

Here are the Minutes of the RAP meeting on the 8th Oct 2008 when NLWA representatives were invited to give a presentation on the NLWP to residents, that we have also sent to councillors on your behalf.

United Kingdom Without Incineration Network The UNWIN site publishes updates and case studies of local anti-incineration campaign groups, pools resources devoted to anti-incineration campaigning and in collaboration with Friends Of The Earth has developed an interactive map of existing and and potential household waste incineration sites. UNWIN is also in the process of publishing more in-depth information about a range of waste management and incineration topics to be stored in the UNWIN Knowledge Bank.


HOME
 
Disclaimer: editorial care is taken to ensure that all items appearing on this blog are factually correct. However, the persons responsible for updating the blog cannot accept responsibilty for any inaccuracies or errors which may occur in its posts and any person acting in reliance upon any information contained herein does so entirely at their own risk.